Impact of Pesticide Use in Indian Agriculture - Their Benefits and Hazards
Md. Wasim Aktar* and M. Paramasivam
Pesticide Residue Laboratory, Department of Agricultural Chemicals,
Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur-741252, Nadia,
West Bengal, India
The term pesticide covers a wide range of compounds including insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, rodenticides, molluscicides,
nematicides, plant growth regulators and others. Among these, organochlorine (OC) insecticides, used successfully in controlling a
number of diseases, such as malaria and typhus, were banned or restricted after the 1960s in most of the technologically advanced
countries. The introduction of other synthetic insecticides – organophosphate (OP) insecticides in the 1960s, carbamates in 1970s
and pyrethroids in 1980s and the introduction of herbicides and fungicides in 1970s - 1980s contributed greatly in pest control and
agricultural output. Ideally a pesticide must be lethal to the targetted pests, but not to non-target species, including man.
Unfortunately, this is not, so the controversy of use and abuse of pesticides has surfaced. The rampant use of these chemicals,
under the adage, “if little is good, a lot more will be better” has played havoc with human and other life forms.
1.1, Production and Usage of pesticide in India
The production of pesticides started in India in 1952 with the establishment of a plant for the production of BHC near Calcutta, and
India is now the second largest manufacturer of pesticides in Asia after China and ranks twelfth globally9. There has been a steady
growth in the production of technical grade pesticides in India, from 5,000 metric tonnes in 1958 to 102,240 metric tonnes in 1998.
In 1996-97 the demand for pesticides in terms of value was estimated to be around Rs. 22 billion (USD 0.5 billion), which is about
2% of the total world market.
The pattern of pesticide usage in India is different from that for the world in general. As can be seen from Figure 1, in India 76% of
the pesticide used is insecticide, as against 44% globally9. The use of herbicides and fungicides is correspondingly less heavy.
The main use of pesticides in India is for cotton crops (45%), followed by paddy and wheat.
Figure 1. Consumption pattern of pesticides
2., BENEFITS OF PESTICIDES:-
2.1, Improving Productivity:- Tremendous benefits have been derived from the use of pesticides in forestry, public health and the
domestic sphere - and, of course, in agriculture, a sector upon which the Indian economy is largely dependent. Food grain
production, which stood at a mere 50 million tonnes in 1948-49, had increased almost fourfold to 198 million tonnes by the end of
1996-97 from an estimated 169 million hectares of permanently cropped land. This result has been achieved by the use of high-
yield varieties of seeds, advanced irrigation technologies and agricultural chemicals1.
Similarly outputs and productivity have increased dramatically in most countries, for example, wheat yields in the United Kingdom,
corn yields in the USA. Increases in productivity have been due to several factors including use of fertiliser, better varieties and use
of machinery. Pesticides have been an integral part of the process by reducing losses from the weeds, diseases and insect pests
that can markedly reduce the amount of harvestable produce. Warren (1998) also drew attention to the spectacular increases in
crop yields in the United States in the twentieth century. Webster et al. (1999) stated that "considerable economic losses" would be
suffered without pesticide use and quantified the significant increases in yield and economic margin that result from pesticide use.
Besides this, most of the pesticides, in environment, undergo photochemical transformation to produce metabolites which are
relatively non-toxic to the human beings as well as environment.47
2.2, Protect Crop losses/yield reduction:- In medium land rice even under puddle conditions during the critical period warranted an
effective and economic weed control practice to prevent a reduction in rice yield due to weeds that ranged from 28 to 48% based on
comparisons that included control (weedy) plots43.Weeds reduce yield of dry land crops43 by 37-79%. Severe infestation of weeds
particularly in early stage of crop establishment ultimately accounts for a yield reduction of 40%. Herbicides provided an economic
and labour benefit too.
2.3, Vector Disease Control:- Vector-borne diseases are most effectively tackled by killing the vectors. Insecticides are often the
only practical way to control the insects that spread deadly diseases such as malaria that results in an estimated 5000 deaths each
day (Ross, 2005). In 2004, Bhatia wrote that malaria is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the developing world
and a major public health problem in India.
2.4, Quality of Food: - In the countries of first world, it is now observed that a diet containing fresh fruit and vegetables far outweigh
potential risks from eating very low residues of pesticides in crops.27 Increasing evidence (Dietary Guidelines, 2005) shows that
eating fruit and vegetables regularly reduces the risk of many cancers, high blood pressure, heart disease, diabetes, stroke, and
other chronic diseases.
Lewis et al (2005) discussed the nutritional properties of apples and blueberries in the US diet and concluded that their high
concentrations of antioxidants act as protectants against cancer, heart disease. Lewis attributed doubling in wild blueberry
production and subsequent increases in consumption chiefly to herbicide use that improved weed control.
2.5, Other area-Transport, Sport Complex, Building:- The transport sector makes extensive use of pesticides, particularly
herbicides. Herbicides and insecticides are used to maintain the turf on sports pitches, cricket grounds and golf courses.
Insecticides protect buildings and other wooden structures from damage by termites and wood boring insects.
3., HAZARDS OF PESTICIDES:-
3.1, Direct Impact On Human Being:- If the credits of pesticides include enhanced economic potential in terms of increased
production of food and fibre, and amelioration of vector-borne diseases, then their debits have resulted in serious health
implications to man and his environment. There is now overwhelming evidence that some of these chemicals do pose potential
risk to humans and other life forms and unwanted side effects to the environment (17-19). No segment of the population is
completely protected against exposure to pesticides and the potentially serious health effects, though a disproportionate burden is
shouldered by the people of developing countries and by high risk groups in each country20. The world-wide deaths and chronic
illnesses due to pesticide poisoning number about 1 million per year21.
The high risk groups exposed to pesticides include the production workers, formulators, sprayers, mixers, loaders and agricultural
farm workers. During manufacture and formulation, the possibility of hazards may be more because the processes involved are not
risk free. In industrial settings, the workers are at increased risk since they handle various toxic chemicals including pesticides, raw
materials, toxic solvents and inert carriers.
In India, the first report of poisoning due to pesticides was from Kerala in 1958, where over 100 people died after consuming wheat
flour contaminated with parathion2. This prompted the Special Committee on Harmful Effects of Pesticides constituted by the ICAR
to focus attention on the problem3. Further, Carlson in 1962 warned that OC compounds could pollute the tissues of virtually every
life form on the earth, the air, the lakes and the oceans, the fishes that live in them and the birds that feed on the fishes4. Later, the
US National Academy of Sciences stated that the DDT metabolite, DDE causes eggshell thinning and that the bald eagle
population in the United States declined primarily because of exposure to DDT and its metabolites5. Certain environmental
chemicals including pesticides termed as endocrine disruptors are known to elicit their adverse effects by mimicking or
antagonising natural hormones in the body and it has been postulated that their long-term, low-dose exposure are increasingly
linked to human health effects such as immunosuppression, hormone disruption, diminished intelligence, reproductive
abnormalities and cancer(6-8).
A study on workers (N=356) in four units manufacturing HCH revealed neurological symptoms (21%) which were related to the
intensity of exposure22. The magnitude of the toxicity risk involved in the spraying of methomyl, a carbamate insecticide, in field
conditions was assessed by the National Institute of Occupational Health (NIOH) 24. Significant changes were noticed in the ECG
and the levels of serum LDH and ChE activities in the spraymen indicating the cardiotoxic effects of methomyl.
Observations confined to health surveillance in male formulators engaged in production of dust and liquid formulations of various
pesticides (malathion, methyl parathion, DDT and lindane) in industrial settings of the unorganised sector revealed a high
occurrence of generalized symptoms (headache, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, irritation of skin and eyes) besides psychological,
neurological, cardiorespiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms coupled with low plasma cholinesterase (ChE) activity 23.
Data on reproductive toxicity were collected from 1,106 couples when the males were associated with the spraying of pesticides
(OC, OP and carbamates) in cotton fields25.
A study in malaria spraymen was initiated to evaluate the effects of a short term (16 week) exposure in workers (N=216) spraying
HCH in field conditions26.
3.2, Impact through Food Commodities:-The UK Pesticide Residue Committee annual report (2002) showed that over 70% of the
food in the UK contained no pesticide residues at all and only 1.09% contained residues above the statutory maximum residue
levels (MRLs). It concluded that “none of these residues caused concern for people's health”. Yet these very small quantities of
chemicals in our food, detected at ever lower levels due to increasingly sensitive laboratory equipment, are now easy targets for the
media. In India, a study revealed that 50% of the vegetable samples taken from farm gate were found contaminated with various
pesticides (0.01-2.23 ppm) of which 16% were above MRL.48
3.3, Impact on Environment:-Pesticides can contaminate soil, water, turf, and other vegetation. In addition to killing insects or
weeds, pesticides can be toxic to a host of other organisms including birds, fish, beneficial insects, and non-target plants.
Insecticides are generally the most acutely toxic class of pesticides, but herbicides can also pose risks to non-target organisms.
3.3.1, Surface Water Contamination:- Pesticides can reach surface water through runoff from treated plants and soil.
Contamination of water by pesticides is widespread. The results of a comprehensive set of studies done by the U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS) on major river basins across the country in the early to mid- 90s yielded startling results. More than 90 percent of
water and fish samples from all streams contained one, or more often, several pesticides.45 Pesticides were found in all samples
from major rivers with mixed agricultural and urban land use influences, and 99 percent of samples of urban streams28. The
USGS also found that concentrations of insecticides in urban streams commonly exceeded guidelines for protection of aquatic life
41. Twenty-three pesticides were detected in waterways in the Puget Sound Basin, including 17 herbicides. According to USGS,
more pesticides were detected in urban streams than in agricultural streams. 29
3.3.2, Ground Water Contamination:- Pesticides, including herbicides, can and do leach to contaminate ground water. According to
the USGS, at least 143 different pesticides and 21 transformation products have been found in the ground water, including
pesticides from every major chemical class. Over the past two decades, detections have been found in the ground water of more
than 43 states30. Contamination of ground water is of concern because ground water supplies 50 percent of the U.S. population
with Drinkingwater31. During one survey in India it has been found that 58% of drinking water samples drawn from various hand
pumps and wells around Bhopal are contaminated with Organ Chlorine pesticides above the EPA standards.46 Once ground water
is polluted with toxic chemicals, it may take many years for the contamination to dissipate or be cleaned up. Cleanup may also be
very costly and complex, if not impossible (32-34).
3.3.3, Soil Contamination:- Pesticides have various characteristics that determine how they act once in soil. Mobility refers to how
much a pesticide will move around in the soil. The half life of a pesticide refers to the length of time it takes for half of the pesticide to
degrade. Persistence refers to the length of time until all measurable residues of a pesticide are gone.
3.3.4, Effect on soil fertility (Beneficial Soil Microorganisms):- One spoonful of healthy soil has millions of tiny organisms
including fungi, bacteria, and a host of others. These microorganisms play a key role in helping plants utilize soil nutrients needed
to grow and thrive. Microorganisms also help soil store water and nutrients, regulate water flow, and filter pollutants38. The heavy
treatment of soil with pesticides can cause populations of beneficial soil microorganisms to decline. Sometimes pesticides have a
negative impact on the available NPK from soil.49 According to soil scientist Dr. Elaine Ingham, “If we lose both bacteria and fungi,
then the soil degrades. Overuse of chemical fertilizers and pesticides have effects on the soil organisms that are similar to human
overuse of antibiotics. Indiscriminate use of chemicals might work for a few years, but after awhile, there aren’t enough beneficial
soil organisms to hold onto the nutrients.” 40.
3.3.5, Contamination of Air, Soil, and Non-target Vegetation:- Pesticide sprays can directly hit non-target vegetation, or can drift or
volatilize from the treated area and contaminate air, soil, and non-target plants. Some pesticide drift occurs during every application,
even from ground equipment35. Drift can account for a loss of 2 to 25% of the chemical being applied, which can spread over a
distance of a few yards to several hundred miles. There are thousands of reported complaints of off target spray drift each year in
the U.S. 36. Many pesticides can volatilize (that is, they can evaporate from soil and foliage, move away from the application, and
contaminate the environment.)38. As much as 80-90 percent of an applied pesticide can be volatilized within a few days of
application39. Despite the fact that only limited research has been done on the topic, studies consistently find pesticide residues in
air. According to the USGS, pesticides have been detected in the atmosphere in all areas of the USA sampled40. Nearly every
pesticide investigated has been detected in rain, air, fog, or snow across the nation at different times of the year41. Many pesticides
have been detected in air at more than half the sites sampled nationwide.
3.3.6, Non-target Organisms:- Pesticides are found as common contaminants in soil, air, water and on non-target organisms in
our urban landscapes. Once there, they can harm plants and animals ranging from beneficial soil microorganisms and insects,
non-target plants, fish, birds, and other wildlife.37
Pesticides are often considered a quick, easy, and inexpensive solution for controlling weeds and insect pests in urban
landscapes. However, pesticide use comes at a significant cost. Pesticides have contaminated almost every part of our
environment. Pesticide residues are found in soil and air, and in surface and ground water across the nation, and urban pesticide
uses contribute to the problem. Pesticide contamination poses significant risks to the environment and non-target organisms
ranging from beneficial soil microorganisms, to insects, plants, fish, and birds. Contrary to common misconceptions, even
herbicides can cause harm to the environment. In fact, weed killers can be especially problematic because they are used in
relatively large volumes. The best way to reduce pesticide contamination (and the harm it causes) in our environment is for all of us
to do our part to use safer, non-chemical pest control (including weed control) methods.
1. Employment Information: Indian Labour Statistics 1994. Chandigarh: Labour Bureau, Ministry of Labour, 1996.
2. Karunakaran, (1958), C.O. The Kerala food poisoning. J Indian Med Assoc, 31: 204.
3. Eds. A.M. Wadhwani and I.J. Lall. (1972) Harmful Effects of Pesticides. Report of the Special Committee of ICAR, Indian Council
of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, p. 44.
4. Carlson, R. (1962) Silent Spring. Houghton-Mifflin Co, Boston.
5. Liroff, R.A. (2000) Balancing risks of DDT and malaria in the global POPs treaty. Pestic Safety News 4: 3.
6. Crisp, T.M., Clegg, E.D., Cooper, R.L., Wood, W.P., Anderson, D.G., Baeteke, K.P., Hoffmann, J.L., Morrow, M.S., Rodier, D.J.,
Schaeffer, J.E., Touart, L.W., Zeeman, M.G. and Patel, Y.M. (1998) Environmental endocrine disruption: An effects assessment
and analysis. Environ Health Perspect, 106: 11.
7. Hurley, P.M., Hill, R.N. and Whiting, R.J. (1998) Mode of carcinogenic action of pesticides inducing thyroid follicular cell tumours
in rodents. Environ Health Perspect 106: 437.
8. Brouwer, A., Longnecker, M.P., Birnbaum, L.S., Cogliano, J., Kostyniak, P., Moore, J., Schantz, S. and Winneke, G. (1999)
Characterization of potential endocrine related health effects at lowdose levels of exposure to PCBs. Environ Health Perspect
9. Mathur, S.C. (1999) Future of Indian pesticides industry in next millennium. Pesticide Information;XXIV(4):9-23.
10. Warren, G.F. (1998) Spectacular Increases in Crop Yields in the United States in the Twentieth Century, Weed Technology, Vol.
11. Webster, J.P.G., R.G. Bowles, and N.T. Williams (1999) Estimating the Economic Benefits of Alternative Pesticide Usage
Scenarios: Wheat Production in the United Kingdom, Crop Production, Vol. 18, P.83.
12. MAF (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry) New Zealand. Motivation for Growing Organic Products (available at http://www.maf.
13. Oerke, E.C. and Dehne, H.W. (2004) Safeguarding Production - Losses in Major Crops and the Role of Crop Protection, Crop
Protection, Vol. 23, P.275.
14. Ross, G., (2005) Risks and benefits of DDT, The Lancet, Vol. 366, No.9499, P.1771November.
15. Lewis, Nancy M., Jamie Ruud, (2005) Blueberries in the American Diet, Nutrition Today, Vol. 40, No.2, P.92March-April.
16. Dietary guidelines for Americans (2005). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Department of Agriculture.
17. Forget, G. (1993) Balancing the need for pesticides with the risk to human health. In: Impact of Pesticide Use on Health in
Developing Countries. Eds. G. Forget, T. Goodman and A. de Villiers, IDRC, Ottawa, p. 2.
18. Igbedioh, S.O. (1991) Effects of agricultural pesticides on humans, animals and higher plants in developing countries. Arch
Environ Health 46: 218.
19. Jeyaratnam, J. (1985) Health problems of pesticide usage in the third world. BMJ 42: 505.
20. WHO. Public Health Impact of Pesticides Used in Agriculture. World Health Organization, Geneva, p. 88, (1990).
21. Environews Forum. Killer environment. Environ Health Perspect 107: A62, (1999).
22. Nigam, S.K., Karnik, A.B., Chattopadhyay, P., Lakkad, B.C., Venkaiah, K. and Kashyap, S.K. (1993) Clinical and biochemical
investigations to evolve early diagnosis in workers involved in the manufacture of hexachlorocyclohexane. Int Arch Occup
Environ Health 65: S193.
23. Gupta, S.K., Jani, J.P., Saiyed, H.N. and Kashyap, S.K. (1984) Health hazards in pesticide formulators exposed to a combination
of pesticides. Indian J Med Res, 79: 666.
24. Saiyed, H.N., Sadhu, H.G., Bhatnagar, V.K., Dewan, A, Venkaiah, K. and Kashyap, S.K. (1992) Cardiac toxicity following short
term exposure to methomyl in spraymen and rabbits. Hum Exp Toxicol, 11: 93.
25. Rupa, D.S., Reddy, P.P. and Reddy, O.S. (1991) Reproductive performance in population exposed to pesticides in cotton fields
in India. Environ Res 55: 123.
26. Gupta, S.K., Parikh. J.R., Shah, M.P., Chatterjee, S.K. and Kashyap, S.K. (1982) Changes in serum exachlorocyclohexane
(HCH) residues in malaria spraymen after short term occupational exposure. Arch Environ Health 37: 41.
27. Brown, Ian UK Pesticides Residue Committee Report (2004) (available online
http://www.pesticides.gov.uk/uploadedfiles/Web_Assets/PRC/PRCannualreport2004 .pdf also available on request).
28. Bortleson, G. and D. Davis. (1987-1995). U.S. Geological Survey & Washington State Department of Ecology. Pesticides in
selected small streams in the Puget Sound Basin. pg. 1-4.
29. US Department of the Interior. (1995). Pesticides in ground water: current understanding of distribution and major influences. U.
S. Geological Survey. National Water Quality Assessment. Factsheet number FS-244-95.
30. Waskom, R. (1994). Best management practices for private well protection. Colorado State Univ. Cooperative Extension
31. O’Neil, W. and Raucher, R. (1998). Groundwater public policy leaflet series #4: The costs of groundwater contamination.
Wayzata, MN:Groundwater Policy Education Project. http:// www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/water/dwg/gw/costofgw.htm (Aug).
32. US EPA. (2001). Managing small-scale application of pesticides to prevent contamination of drinking water. Water protection
practices bulletin, Washington, DC: Office of Water (July). EPA 816-F-01-031.
33. Johnson, J. and Ware, W.G. (1991). Pesticide litigation manual 1992 edition. Clark Boardman Callaghan Environmental Law
Series, New York, NY. 65. US EPA. 1999. Spray drift of pesticides. Washington, DC: Office of Pesticide Programs (December).
34. US EPA. (1999). Spray drift of pesticides. Washington, DC:Office of Pesticide Programs (December).
35. Glotfelty and Schomburg. (1989). Volatilization of pesticides from soil in Reactions and Movements of organic chemicals in soil.
Eds. BL Sawhney and K. Brown. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America Special Pub.
36. Que, S. et al. (1975). Factors effecting the volatility of DDT, dieldrin, and dimethylamine salt of (2,4-dichlorophenoxy) acetic acid
(2,4-D) from leaf and glass surfaces. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 13(3):284-290.
37. USGS. (1995). Pesticides in the atmosphere: current understanding of distribution and major influences. Fact Sheet FS- 152-
38. Marx, J et al. (1999). The relationship between soil and water, how soil amendments and compost can aid in salmon recovery.
Soils for Salmon 1-18.
39. Majewski, M. and P. Capel. (1995). Pesticides in the atmosphere: distribution, trends, and governing factors. Volume one,
Pesticides in the Hydrologic System. Ann Arbor Press Inc. pg. 118.
40. Savonen, C. (1997). Soil microorganisms object of new OSU service. Good Fruit Grower.
41. U.S. Geological Survey. (1999). The quality of our nation’s waters – nutrients and pesticides. Circular 1225. Reston VA: USGS.
42. Bhatia, Mrigesh R., Fox-Rushby, J and Mills, M. (2004) Cost-effectiveness of malaria control interventions when malaria
mortality is low: insecticide-treated nets versus in-house residual spraying in India. Soil Science and Medicine, Vol. 59, p-525.
43. Behera, Basudev, Gauri Shankar Singh. (1999) Studies on Weed Management in Monsoon Season Crop of Tomato. Indian
Journal of Weed Science, Vol. 31, No.1+2, p-67.
44. Porwal, M.K. (2002) Relative Economics of Weed Management Systems in Winter Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatus L.) in
Command Area of Southern Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Weed Science, Vol. 34, No.1+2, P.88.
45. Kole R.K., Banerjee H. and Bhattacharyya A. (2001) Monitoring of market fish samples for Endosulfan and
Hexachlorocyclohexane residues in and around Calcutta. Bull. Envir. Contam. Toxicol 67: 554-559.
46. Kole R.K. and Bagchi M.M. (1995) Pesticide residues in the aquatic environment and their possible ecological hazards. J.
Inland Fish. Soc. India. 27(2): 79-89.
47. Kole R.K., Banerjee H., Bhattacharyya A., Chowdhury A. and AdityaChaudhury N. (1999) Photo transformation of some
pesticides. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 76:595-600.
48. Kole R.K., Banerjee H. and Bhattacharyya A. (2002) Monitoring of pesticide residues in farm gate vegetable samples in west
Bengal. Pest. Res. J. 14(1): 77-82.
49. Sardar D. and Kole R.K. (2005) Metabolism of Chlorpyriphos in relation to its effect on the availability of some plant nutrients in
soil. Chemosphere 61: 1273-1280.
*Correspondence to: Md. Wasim Aktar, e-mail id : firstname.lastname@example.org
Tel. No. +91-9474126188